Temporize -
Filed under

software

 

Chrome on OSX

Now I now browsers aren't usually cause for celebrations, but I've been giving the Chrome Beta on OSX a bit of a workout since it's release late last year, and I have to say, it's rocking my world.

I'd had the development version installed since it was made available mid way though last year, and while it was fine for testing sites with, I'd stuck with Firefox as my everyday browser due to Chrome's tendency to crash and lack of userscripts. Having said that, I have found the beta release very solid and reliable, and am now using it for everyday browsing.

After running it through it's paces, I've been really impressed with not only Chrome's speed and stability, but also some great UX touches. The smoothness of the animations when opening and closing the tabs is a sharp contrast to that of Safari and Firefox, both which seem jarring by comparison. The way in which the remaining tabs slide out to fill the space left by a closed tab is also a great touch. 

The most noticeable aspect of the tabs though is that Google have decided to place the tabs above the search bar, as opposed to below it. I hadn't really been a fan of it when I first tried it out in the Safari 4 beta (which must have been universal, as it was dropped for the final release), but after using in Chrome, I am now annoyed with how much extra space is taken up in Safari and Firefox with tabs sitting below the search bar, especially if the bookmark bar is visible. Again, it is also visually jarring moving to two tabs if you have 'Always show the tab bar' option deactivated. An issue that is avoided the Chrome model.

The bookmark bar was one of the things that initially annoyed me about Chrome. Unlike the other browsers, Chrome ads a little favicon next to the bookmark, or folder icon to indicate when there is a folder of bookmarks there instead of just an individual bookmark. I good idea in theory, except having a number of bookmarks or folders in your bookmark bar means that there are number of these icons taking up prime real estate, resulting in not all of your bookmarks being visible. Annoying. I also found that visually these folders and favicons are a little intrusive.

Now I say initially annoyed me, as it wasn't until I turned off the bookmark bar that one of Chromes most subtle, but useful, UX features revealed itself. After the bookmark bar is deactivated, the bar detaches from the navigation at the top of the browser and becomes a floating element only visible on the home page. Amazing. Having the extra vertical space in my browser window while still having easy access to my bookmarks is one of the many little things that makes Chrome a joy to use.

The address bar and status bar include other subtle little UX features that really add to the Chrome experience. The URLs in the address bar have been broken up by colour in order to highlight the domain name (which is in black), or show that you are using a secure site by changing the HTTPS to green. Although the usual padlock icon is also still used to signify this, it's nice to see a little more thought and detail have gone into the browser, without impeding the browsing experience. The status bar also achieves this by only appearing when you hover over a link or when a page is loading. It also moves out of the way if you wish to access a link that it is covering. Like the bookmark bar, it's there when you need it an not when you don't.

The last main UX change that I wanted to touch on were the downloads in Chrome. The issue of having a separate window to show downloads is something that I find annoying in all applications. Cyberduck is a serious offender. Firefox made a small move towards removing the window with the downloading icon in the status bar, but this still opened up the downloads window each time you clicked on it. Chrome moves away from a separate window entirely by showing the current downloads in a strip along the bottom of the browser window. For a more detailed view, a new tab is opened listing the entire download history. This window integration (similar to how Safari treats the bookmark manager) helps to keep the browser much more contained and reduces visual clutter. Chrome also manages extensions in the same manner. 

There are a few UX element in Chrome that are still lacking behind that of Firefox, and even Safari. One of these, although minor, is moving between folders in the bookmark bar. WIth both Safari and Chrome this requires deselecting a folder/drop down before being able to move onto another, as opposed to simply moving between them. Safari though, at least gives you access to the other folders in the bookmark when one is selected, as opposed to Chrome which obscures other folders with the list of sites in the selected folder. The other area for consideration with bookmarks is the bookmark manager. It would be great to see this treated the same and the history and extensions pages.

I've spent a good couple of months with Chrome now, and overall, I'd say it's off to a strong start. The browser is robust and powerful, while still feeling nimble and responsive. Ironically, I'd say that Chromes greatest strength is in it's lack of chrome. Google have managed to design a browser that gets out of the way and lets you browse the web with as little interference and clutter as possible, which is what great design is about. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   interactive   software   UX  

Comments [0]

Typekit For Print

After discussing the idea with John from The Golden Grouse the other week, I've been thinking a little more on how a cloud based type library might work. Such a library, accessible via subscription, not only makes sense for web designers looking to expand their web type palate, but also for any designer requiring access to a large number of typefaces on a regular basis.

Avoiding issues such as duplicates, corrupt fonts and lost files would alone make such a system workthwile, but the main benefit would be greater financial accessibility to type faces. If users gained access to such a system via a monthly/yearly subscription model, typeface creators could be payed on a 'per use' basis, or with a contractual yearly amount depending on the foundry. Having such a database of typefaces at your fingertips for a yearly fee would sound extremely appealing to any designer, especially those who do not currently have access to legal versions due to licensing costs.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   software   system  

Comments [2]

Web Type In Moderation

It's great to finally see that type on the web is starting to come of age. Although I've become quite adapt at working with a limited font pallet over the last 10 years, having the option to work outside this restriction is a welcome development. 

Yet I can't help but feel slightly nervous about what this could potentially mean. The adoption of Flash in the late '90s opened the way for a barrage of excessively long introduction animations, sound effects and a 'Flash for Flash sake' mentality, which It took us 5 or so years to move past. Ultimately hindering, more than helping, the development of the web. 

So it's not hard to imagine that ability to incorporate any font into a web page will result in just that. Fonts for fonts sake. MySpace is a great 21st century example of excessive and over designing. Add to this the ability to include any font that ship with windows, and you're just making a bad situation worse.  

There are technical and legal restrictions that might help to curb this potential issue, but should mass adoption take hold, I don't see these being much of a safeguard for long. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   software   system  

Comments [1]

Erik Spiekermann on web fonts

Spiekermann talks about the difference between using software and owning it, and how in the world of type, this was the norm up until desktop publishing.

Although not a new concept, I think it works well in this situation, and I would be interested to see how this could be applied to the printing industry as well as the web.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   software   system  

Comments [0]

10 Years Too Late

Most innovative are the plans to offer unlimited downloads for a flat fee. British internet providers are keen to offer such a service, the cost of which would be rolled into the monthly bill.

Napster, the first main file sharing service to make an impact on the record industry, was released 10 years ago in June. At the time it was shut down, I remember polls and articles asking why a service such as Napster couldn't work as a paid service. Not on a per song basis such as iTunes, but as an 'all you can eat' service, supported by a flat monthly fee. It was a great idea that a lot of consumers were interested in.

So why didn't it go ahead? The primary reason was that in able to be a competitive service, the libraries of music had to be as good, if not better, than what the pirates could offer, which required complete co-operation from all of the major labels. Unsurprisingly, this didn't happen.

So it's quite ironic that 10 years later, after the major labels have taken a massive finacial beating, partly at the hands of piracy, does this great idea finally get dug up an marked as 'innovative' ...

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   software   system  

Comments [0]

How Piracy is Pushing the Digital Envelope

News that the Swedish online music service Spotify will be releasing an iPhone application is generating quite a bit of a buzz online. Spotify provides an extensive online music library that is free to access and listen to. The free service is supported by adverts, or you can sign up for £9.99 a month for a premium account, which has no ads (you will need to have a premium account in order to use the iPhone application).

Spotify is a great example of online music distribution done right. Sure, you can't download the tracks, but it's there to use for free, allowing you to 'try before you buy' from somewhere else, which is what I mainly used bit torrent trackers such as The Pirate Bay for. The question is, would there even be a Spotify if it wasn't sites like The Pirate Bay?

Back in April, when The Pirate Bay founders were jailed sentenced to a year in prison for their operation the site, the BBC published an interview with Mark Mulligan from Forrester Research. Mr Mulligan went on to say how Spotify was "one real example we've got of how the music industry is building a new (legal) business around new ways of distributing music". The thing is, Mulligan fails to mention why the music industry is building this new business, or, more to the point, how they have actually been playing catch up to a digital distribution model that has been in full swing for almost 10 years. Piracy.

Matt Mason, author of The Pirate’s Dilemma, says that "piracy is the sharp end of innovation". In a recent article for the BBC, he wrote about how pirates are "highlighting a better way for us to do things; they find gaps outside the market, and better ways for society to operate".

Site like The Pirate Bay have shown people that music, movies and all sorts of digital content can be easily distributed online (much to the dismay of the companies controlling and monetising that content). But without people taking these risks and, in this case, developing new methods of distribution, the chances are that services like Spotify would never have been considered, let alone be the working, productive business model it is today.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   software   system  

Comments [0]

Epaper/Ebook update

A little while ago (about a year) I published a little article on my take of the future of digital publishing. Since then there has been a number of advancements in digital paper and eReaders. While not a huge step forward, The Kindle from Amazon is one such product that shows us the direction the publishing world is headed. I wouldn't go as far to say its the iPod of eReaders, but for a company such as Amazon to invest in such a product definitely shows that this is an area in the future of publishing that warrants serious attention.

But, if you're like me, then a big white brick with a mono display (and a stupid name) is not really what you what to be reading your novels on, let alone a magazine. Where are the eBooks that are exactly that, A book? with actual pages? Thankfully researchers at Maryland and Berkeley Universities in the US have been working on such a device and developed a prototype eBook with two displays that simulate the turning of pages. While still a bit on the chunky side, this humanising of  technology is what is needed to successfully move the publishing world forward in the digital arena.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   object   software  

Comments [0]

Epaper and the future of magazines

After years of speculation, digital paper is finally stating to make an appearance. Like movies and music before it, mainstream publishing is moving toward the digital realm, and with many of the top electronic brands such as Sony, Fujitsu and Philips pouring resources into the development of digital paper, electronic books and readers using this new technology are sure to be as much apart of out lives in the future as the iPod is now.

With the help of the Internet, the last 10 years has seen a massive increase in the publishing of digital publications and zines. There are now sites such as pdf-mags.com that cater specifically for independently published digital publications, and more recently, the iTunes store has seen the inclusion of PDF magazines as part of their podcast subscription service. Magazines such as The Fader have already started making the transition and are now letting readers download a digital copy of the magazine for free.

As we have already seen, copyright and illegal distribution of digital files over the internet has become quite a thorn in the side of the music and film industries, with the RIAA and MPAA going as far as to sue individuals for downloading copyright material. Recently television networks in Australia have started blowing the “piracy” trumpet, claiming that the illegal distribution of television shows over the internet are hurting the ratings and are responsible for a loss in advertising revenue.

So what then for the publishing industry? Will the AAP and MPA be the next to cry thief and start taking the public to court? Or will a smarter approach be taken, one that doesn’t involve making criminals out of ones customers. Sooner rather than later we will see the emergence of an iTunes like application for storing, arranging and viewing digital and PDF magazines, which will only help to propel the digital publishing arena forward, and will most certainly do for publishing what pod casting had done for radio. This is where the magazine and book publishers need to be looking. It won’t be long before storage and reading devices using digital paper arrive to integrate with these applications, at which point the digital publishing revolution will truly begin.

1000 magazines in your pocket anyone?

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   object   software  

Comments [0]