Temporize -

WIRED Goes Digital

The latest development in the digital magazine is from WIRED. I must say, I'm intrigued. The thought of not having my magazine slide under the door every month leaves me feeling a little sad, but then I felt the same way about not being able to take 15 minutes showers any more, and I got over that.

The partnership with Adobe though is very interesting. When you think about it, designing specific content and applications for iPad, iPhone and the PC does seem a little excessive (and extremely expensive). Being able to build one delivery system that can then be packaged for each device makes much more sense. 

Still, I hope my iPhone doesn't start whirring like my laptop does when ever Flash is present. 

UPDATE: Here is a link to the original piece, in which Adobe announced:

that AIR would run on Android, and Adobe has already announced its Packager for iPhone tool that will allow Flash apps (including AIR) to run on Apple mobile platforms

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Chrome on OSX

Now I now browsers aren't usually cause for celebrations, but I've been giving the Chrome Beta on OSX a bit of a workout since it's release late last year, and I have to say, it's rocking my world.

I'd had the development version installed since it was made available mid way though last year, and while it was fine for testing sites with, I'd stuck with Firefox as my everyday browser due to Chrome's tendency to crash and lack of userscripts. Having said that, I have found the beta release very solid and reliable, and am now using it for everyday browsing.

After running it through it's paces, I've been really impressed with not only Chrome's speed and stability, but also some great UX touches. The smoothness of the animations when opening and closing the tabs is a sharp contrast to that of Safari and Firefox, both which seem jarring by comparison. The way in which the remaining tabs slide out to fill the space left by a closed tab is also a great touch. 

The most noticeable aspect of the tabs though is that Google have decided to place the tabs above the search bar, as opposed to below it. I hadn't really been a fan of it when I first tried it out in the Safari 4 beta (which must have been universal, as it was dropped for the final release), but after using in Chrome, I am now annoyed with how much extra space is taken up in Safari and Firefox with tabs sitting below the search bar, especially if the bookmark bar is visible. Again, it is also visually jarring moving to two tabs if you have 'Always show the tab bar' option deactivated. An issue that is avoided the Chrome model.

The bookmark bar was one of the things that initially annoyed me about Chrome. Unlike the other browsers, Chrome ads a little favicon next to the bookmark, or folder icon to indicate when there is a folder of bookmarks there instead of just an individual bookmark. I good idea in theory, except having a number of bookmarks or folders in your bookmark bar means that there are number of these icons taking up prime real estate, resulting in not all of your bookmarks being visible. Annoying. I also found that visually these folders and favicons are a little intrusive.

Now I say initially annoyed me, as it wasn't until I turned off the bookmark bar that one of Chromes most subtle, but useful, UX features revealed itself. After the bookmark bar is deactivated, the bar detaches from the navigation at the top of the browser and becomes a floating element only visible on the home page. Amazing. Having the extra vertical space in my browser window while still having easy access to my bookmarks is one of the many little things that makes Chrome a joy to use.

The address bar and status bar include other subtle little UX features that really add to the Chrome experience. The URLs in the address bar have been broken up by colour in order to highlight the domain name (which is in black), or show that you are using a secure site by changing the HTTPS to green. Although the usual padlock icon is also still used to signify this, it's nice to see a little more thought and detail have gone into the browser, without impeding the browsing experience. The status bar also achieves this by only appearing when you hover over a link or when a page is loading. It also moves out of the way if you wish to access a link that it is covering. Like the bookmark bar, it's there when you need it an not when you don't.

The last main UX change that I wanted to touch on were the downloads in Chrome. The issue of having a separate window to show downloads is something that I find annoying in all applications. Cyberduck is a serious offender. Firefox made a small move towards removing the window with the downloading icon in the status bar, but this still opened up the downloads window each time you clicked on it. Chrome moves away from a separate window entirely by showing the current downloads in a strip along the bottom of the browser window. For a more detailed view, a new tab is opened listing the entire download history. This window integration (similar to how Safari treats the bookmark manager) helps to keep the browser much more contained and reduces visual clutter. Chrome also manages extensions in the same manner. 

There are a few UX element in Chrome that are still lacking behind that of Firefox, and even Safari. One of these, although minor, is moving between folders in the bookmark bar. WIth both Safari and Chrome this requires deselecting a folder/drop down before being able to move onto another, as opposed to simply moving between them. Safari though, at least gives you access to the other folders in the bookmark when one is selected, as opposed to Chrome which obscures other folders with the list of sites in the selected folder. The other area for consideration with bookmarks is the bookmark manager. It would be great to see this treated the same and the history and extensions pages.

I've spent a good couple of months with Chrome now, and overall, I'd say it's off to a strong start. The browser is robust and powerful, while still feeling nimble and responsive. Ironically, I'd say that Chromes greatest strength is in it's lack of chrome. Google have managed to design a browser that gets out of the way and lets you browse the web with as little interference and clutter as possible, which is what great design is about. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   interactive   software   UX  

Comments [0]

Bing Maps Jump Ahead

Following Alex Payne's example, I'm going to move onto some events/products/design that are really exciting me at the moment. One of the latest talks from TED 2010 is Blaise Aguera y Arcas demoing the new augmented-reality features in Bing Maps. Some of these have already been implemented by Google, but the new Flickr and video integration is outstanding. 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   interactive   UX  

Comments [0]

Murdoch on E-book Sales

“We don’t like the Amazon model of selling everything at $9.99,” Murdoch said. “They pay us the wholesale price of $14 or whatever we charge,” he said. “But I think it really devalues books, and it hurts all the retailers of the hardcover books.”

I'm not going to say any more on how rediculous this sounds ... more over at WIRED.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

All Else Seems Trivial

Do yourself a favour and watch this in HD fullscreen. 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Power Corrupts

It seems that I'm not the only one with some serious concerns about where Apple is heading. From Alex Payne:

Honestly, as simple a step as Apple making iPhone/iPad SDK access free – along with its ability to install apps on the Apple devices you paid for – would be an acceptable first step towards openness. Let’s do some clumsy math on this point. According to Wikipedia, there are currently around 140,000 apps in the App Store. Let’s round up and say that each app is made by a different developer. So, at $99 per year per developer, that’s $13,860,000 per year that Apple is making selling SDK access. For a company that just posted a net quarterly profit of $3.38 billion, I think it’s safe to call the SDK money a drop in the bucket.
 
Further, the argument that Apple has invested in the “Open Web” as an alternative free platform for their devices simply doesn’t ring true to me. Talk to any non-geek iPhone user and you’ll quickly realize that they have no idea that web apps can, for example, be saved to the home screen like regular apps. The general attitude, once they get used to the phone, is that if there isn’t an app for it, it’s not worth doing on the device. And why wouldn’t they have this impression? Apple’s ad campaign isn’t “there’s an app for that, and also the entire open web”. For now, the web is an afterthought on these devices.

Mark Pilgrim also has a great follow up to this piece. 


Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Pure Genius

by the very talented Mr Oslo Davis.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

iPad vs Netbook

Yes, we've all got something to say on the issue. There are a number of things I could bring up about the release of the iPad this week, but for now, the one that has been bugging me is how Steve Jobs has classified Apple's newest device, or more importantly, how he classifies netbooks. Jobs' pitch is that the iPad fits in as a third device between the iPhone and the MacBook, and that a netbook does not. It's been long know that Job's has a dislike for netbooks and sees them as just 'cheap laptops', but that he would see them as an additional device for someone already owning a laptop is something I find a bit odd, and throws up the question as to whether Jobs actually understands why netbooks are so popular in the first place. 

I currently own a MacBook Pro, which I use for my primary work machine and home machine. This has been great in terms of choosing to work at home some days, or at a friends studio on others. But constantly having to pack up and lug around a laptop plus accessories has started to get a little tedious after two years. When I went back to uni last year, I started toying with the idea of separating these machines. An iMac for work and a netbook (hacked to run OSX) for all else. Netbooks are a lot less intrusive for use in a lecture, on public transport or just to carry around in a shoulder bag, all things where a 15, or even a 13 inch MacBook is little too bulky.   

Jobs is right in one sense. A netbook doesn't do anything better than a laptop, but it does do everything a laptop does at a super portable size. Something the iPad does not, and cannot do. I think Casey Reas said it best in a tweet the day of launch:

The iPad is for consuming media, not producing media -- I don't like that direction

Maybe I'm wrong, but I believe by locking the iPad to the iTunes app store, Jobs has isolated the students and professionals who are looking for a machine to produce on, and who don't have a spare $500 to drop on an additional device just for browsing the web, watching movies or listening to music. 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Clinton vs Conroy?

Speaking in Washington, the US secretary of state will announce a policy to increase access to an uncensored internet for people in other countries, her innovation adviser said.

Oh, but thats right, the internet in Australia isn't being censored, just 'filtered' for our own protection ...  [link]

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

webOS Developers Not Limited to Store

In a follow up to yesterdays post, I've just been going over the new Palm Developer Centre and was surprised, and happy, to see that developers can choose between distributing their apps through the Palm App Catalogue, or if they choose, via their own site or blog.

Palm offers multiple ways to distribute the apps you create, so you can choose whichever ones work best for your business.

The App Catalog built in to every webOS phone gives customers one simple and direct place to shop for paid and free apps, all of which are downloaded over the air.

If you're looking to get your app to customers outside of the App Catalog, you can use our web distribution option. Doing so gives you a unique URL that lets customers install your app either from their phone or desktop browser. You can distribute that URL through online directories and communities—or any other way. With Palm, your reach isn't limited to a single store; it's as broad as the web itself.

It doesn't mention if the app still needs to be submitted for approval by Palm before a URL will be supplied when distributing via a 3rd party site. 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]